City manager’s contract renewal abruptly removed from the council agenda
By Loretta Cozart
An item directing the mayor to renew City Manager Jim Palenick’s, contract was removed from the city council’s agenda after it had been published as a discussion item the week before.
The City of Kings Mountain published the agenda for the regular city council meeting on August 22.
Item H included: Motion to adopt and authorize the mayor to enter into an employment agreement with the City Manager.
The proposed city manager’s contract included a salary of $189,305 and other benefits provided to all city employees. Additionally, the city manager would receive a $500 car allowance, four weeks of vacation, and a merit and performance package as part of his compensation, which read:
“That the merit bonus payable to the Manager shall be one fourth of 1% of cash payments paid to the City, during the term of this amended agreement. The city shall pay that amount within 90 days of receipt of a cash payment to the City by the Albemarle Corporation. That additionally all land donated to the City by the Albemarle Corporation, during the term of this Amended Agreement, which may be suitable for development by the City shall be appraised, and that the Manager shall receive a merit bonus of one fourth of 1% of the appraised values. For clarity, real estate deemed developable must not be constrained by conservation, utility, wetland easements or any other set-asides which may render the real estate undevelopable.”
Item H had been removed from the agenda by Friday morning, and a revised agenda was published.
During the Citizen Recognition portion of the meeting on August 27, Kings Mountain Business owner Jimbo Thompson addressed the city council, saying, “I think it's imperative that the citizens of Kings Mountain know what's going on and their council’s involvement. It is of most importance that the city manager serves at the council's pleasure. However, I don't think this is the case.
“According to the council members, none of them, nor the mayor, have ever sat in on any negotiations between the city and Albemarle. That means our city manager negotiates on behalf of the citizens of Kings Mountain, with no oversight.
“So last week, when the city published this night's agenda, there was an item that's no longer on there. I read the proposed contract language, as many others have. I was taken aback and received numerous calls from the business leaders in the city. An egregious contract asking to take funds from the citizens of Kings Mountain for his own personal gain struck very hard,” he continued.
“Not only did he (the city manager) ask for a percentage of these funds, but he also asked the city that any land donated be
appraised and that a percentage of that be taken for himself as well.
“When someone makes a bold move like this, you must look at their past. I did just that. I found his history to be nothing more than losses to previous municipalities.”
Thompson then reviewed the city manager’s employment past, citing three municipalities that had fired him, and he received severance packages. He also cited a New Mexico Supreme Court decision finding for the municipality. “He not only took $110,000 from Rio Rancho, but he also doubled down and filed suit for an additional $111,000, which the New Mexico Supreme Court ruled against”
“I ask the council to consider not renewing his contract and begin searching for someone to replace him immediately.”
As this item was not on the agenda for the evening, no discussion or action was taken.
An item directing the mayor to renew City Manager Jim Palenick’s, contract was removed from the city council’s agenda after it had been published as a discussion item the week before.
The City of Kings Mountain published the agenda for the regular city council meeting on August 22.
Item H included: Motion to adopt and authorize the mayor to enter into an employment agreement with the City Manager.
The proposed city manager’s contract included a salary of $189,305 and other benefits provided to all city employees. Additionally, the city manager would receive a $500 car allowance, four weeks of vacation, and a merit and performance package as part of his compensation, which read:
“That the merit bonus payable to the Manager shall be one fourth of 1% of cash payments paid to the City, during the term of this amended agreement. The city shall pay that amount within 90 days of receipt of a cash payment to the City by the Albemarle Corporation. That additionally all land donated to the City by the Albemarle Corporation, during the term of this Amended Agreement, which may be suitable for development by the City shall be appraised, and that the Manager shall receive a merit bonus of one fourth of 1% of the appraised values. For clarity, real estate deemed developable must not be constrained by conservation, utility, wetland easements or any other set-asides which may render the real estate undevelopable.”
Item H had been removed from the agenda by Friday morning, and a revised agenda was published.
During the Citizen Recognition portion of the meeting on August 27, Kings Mountain Business owner Jimbo Thompson addressed the city council, saying, “I think it's imperative that the citizens of Kings Mountain know what's going on and their council’s involvement. It is of most importance that the city manager serves at the council's pleasure. However, I don't think this is the case.
“According to the council members, none of them, nor the mayor, have ever sat in on any negotiations between the city and Albemarle. That means our city manager negotiates on behalf of the citizens of Kings Mountain, with no oversight.
“So last week, when the city published this night's agenda, there was an item that's no longer on there. I read the proposed contract language, as many others have. I was taken aback and received numerous calls from the business leaders in the city. An egregious contract asking to take funds from the citizens of Kings Mountain for his own personal gain struck very hard,” he continued.
“Not only did he (the city manager) ask for a percentage of these funds, but he also asked the city that any land donated be
appraised and that a percentage of that be taken for himself as well.
“When someone makes a bold move like this, you must look at their past. I did just that. I found his history to be nothing more than losses to previous municipalities.”
Thompson then reviewed the city manager’s employment past, citing three municipalities that had fired him, and he received severance packages. He also cited a New Mexico Supreme Court decision finding for the municipality. “He not only took $110,000 from Rio Rancho, but he also doubled down and filed suit for an additional $111,000, which the New Mexico Supreme Court ruled against”
“I ask the council to consider not renewing his contract and begin searching for someone to replace him immediately.”
As this item was not on the agenda for the evening, no discussion or action was taken.